ESM-2026-002Late
Waste Heat Recovery System
vs target29%
Due Nov 26
Building energy reporting for Malaysia
Act 861 compliance, handled.
Savings proven.
Your energy data becomes a submission-ready EE&C report for Suruhanjaya Tenaga. Every saving you claim is measured to IPMVP, so it holds up when someone checks.
Start with twelve months of utility bills. No meters to install.
Report readiness
FY 2026 · due 31 Mar 2027
53%
of modules filed-ready across 2 buildings
PharmaTech Plant Nilai50%
Menara Hafizi Tower56%
Energy flow
31,390 GJ
Verified savings
RM16,650/yr
107%
of what it was
estimated to deliver
IPMVP Option C · frozen baseline, R² 0.94
Built against
Suruhanjaya TenagaAct 861 · EE&C Act 2024P.U. (A) 466/2024GP/ST/No.45/2024MS ISO 50001IPMVP
Am I in scope?
Two routes in. Most people only check one.
Act 861 bites at 21,600 GJ in any twelve consecutive months, not a calendar year. And a commercial office at or above 8,000 m² is in regardless of its total.
Nothing is stored or emailed. You get the answer either way.
Enter your figures
Showing a sample buildingTwelve months from your TNB statements.
Gas, diesel, LPG. In gigajoules, see the note below.
Only if this is a commercial office. Leave at 0 otherwise.
Your twelve-month total31,391 GJ
21,600 GJ threshold
Electricity 20,298 GJOther fuels 11,093 GJ
Likely in scope
Your total is 45% above the 21,600 GJ threshold, so Act 861’s energy-consumer duties would apply: a Registered Energy Manager, an energy management system, an audit and an annual EE&C report covering 10 modules.
Indicative only. Not a determination by Suruhanjaya Tenaga. Electricity converts at exactly 0.0036 GJ/kWh, which is arithmetic. Gas, diesel and LPG convert through coefficients ST publishes and periodically revises, so this tool asks for them in GJ rather than quoting a figure that may have moved. Keeping those current across your whole portfolio is part of what the platform does.
0
Report modules
nine for a commercial premise
0
IPMVP options
A, B and C, per measure
0
Sign-offs per figure
BPIC, then your REM
0
Meters to start
utility bills are enough
Everything the Act asks for, and the part it doesn’t
Filing is the obligation. Knowing which of your measures paid back is the reason to keep the platform after March.
The report, not a dashboard
Ten modules structured to ST's own guideline. What you fill in is what gets filed.
Intensity you can act on
EIP calculated for you, then split into fixed load and activity load.
Drivers found, not guessed
Hours, temperature and output regressed against consumption, with R² on the record.
Measures tracked to money
Every measure on a board and a timeline, with investment and payback recalculated as it moves.
Savings that survive an audit
IPMVP Option A, B and C, with frozen baselines and cumulative-sum tracking.
Two people accountable
Your BPIC submits, your REM verifies, and every change carries a name and a timestamp.
What you actually file
It generates when it’s ready. Not before.
Every module feeds one document. If something is missing, the generator names it rather than exporting a return you cannot defend.
Energy Efficiency & Conservation Report
PharmaTech Plant Nilai · FY 2026
100%
- 01Premise Profile
- 02Energy Information
- 03Operation Info
- 04Energy Management System
- 05Energy Consumption
- 06Production & SEC
- 07Variable Data
- 08Energy Intensity Performance
- 09Energy Saving Measures
- 10Saving Performance
Not ready to file
Finish these before this year’s report can be generated:
Energy ConsumptionProduction & SECVariable DataEnergy Saving MeasuresSaving Performance
Ready to file
Generate reportPDF, in ST’s section order
Prepared per the Guidelines on Energy Efficiency and Conservation Report [GP/ST/No.45/2024]
The report is the product
Ten modules, or nine. It depends what you are.
Production & SEC only applies where there is output to divide energy by, so a commercial premise files nine and is measured out of nine. Switch sector and the modules, the fields and the denominator all change.
- Structured to the Guidelines on EE&C Report
- Sector-aware fields, down to palm-oil FFB and MSPO
- Readiness per module, per building, all year
My premise is
10 of 10
modules apply to you
PharmaTech Plant Nilai50% filed-ready
5Complete
5In progress
0Not applicable
Analytics that survive an audit
A worse EIP than last year isn’t always a worse building
Intensity moves whenever your production does. GreenBOS separates the load that runs regardless from the load that tracks activity, then regresses the drivers behind it.
Fixed load, separated from activity load
Tells you whether a bad year was the building or the production schedule.
Regression that recommends
Names the normaliser worth using instead of leaving you to read a scatter plot.
Coefficients kept current
Updated when Suruhanjaya Tenaga revises them, so a guideline change is not a migration.
Energy intensity performance · kWh/m²/yr
GFA 45,000 m²
Rawwhat ST asks for193.8
31,390 GJ
Structuralfixed load, runs whatever you produce1.11%
174 GJ
Operationalactivity load, moves with production192.799%
31,216 GJ
Raw EIP, month by month · axis 29–35
Measures, tracked to money
From proposal to payback, on one board
A card sitting in “In Progress” looks the same whether it is early or nine weeks late, so the timeline sits above the board.
Energy saving measures
2 measures tracked
ESM-2026-002
ESM-2026-001
Jan 26TodayDec 26
Proposed0
Nothing here
In Progress1
Completed1
ESM-2026-001
Compressed-air leak survey
RM 16,650/yr realised
Done Feb 26
Rejected0
Nothing here
- Investment
- RM 238,000
- Projected saving
- 135,000 kWh/yr
- Cost saving
- RM 49,950/yr
- Blended payback
- 4.8 yrs
Savings you can prove
Anyone can report a saving. Fewer can defend one.
Every measure is verified to IPMVP against a frozen baseline, with the fit statistics on the record beside the number. When a saving is too small to meter, the platform says so on the report.
- Frozen baselines, re-based per reporting year
- CUSUM tracking, so drift shows up as it happens
- Bottom-up measures reconciled against the main meter
Realised savings vs frozen baseline
IPMVP Option C · whole facility · 6 months reported
- Baseline
- Jan 25 – Dec 25
- R²
- 0.94
- Sig F
- <0.001
- Energy saved
- 426,161 kWh
- Cost saved
- RM 157,679
- vs baseline
- 7.0 %
- Realisation rate
- 107 %
beat estimate
How each measure is verified
- AEngineering estimatein useKey parameters measured, the rest estimated. Where a measure saves under 10% of building load and the system isn't separately metered.
- BMetered isolationavailable on sub-meteringThe affected system metered on its own, so the saving is measured rather than modelled. Sub-metering upgrades a measure to here.
- CWhole facilityin useThe main meter against a frozen regression baseline, re-based each year. Resolves savings above roughly 10% of total load.
Two people sign it
Built for the person who has to sign it
Act 861 names the roles and attaches the accountability to them. The software models that chain instead of logging everyone as “a user”.
BPIC
Building Person In Charge
Works one building. Keys the data in month by month and submits each module upward.
- Module-by-module entry
- Monthly submission
- Readiness tracking
REM
Registered Energy Manager
Works across the portfolio. Verifies what the BPIC submits and signs off saving measures.
- Cross-building portfolio
- Verification authority
- ESM sign-off
ADMIN
System Administrator
Registers buildings, manages users and holds the audit log. Never edits a figure.
- User management
- Audit log
- Financial year setup
Are you a REM working across client portfolios?
There is a page about what the platform does for an energy management practice, rather than for one building.
Built for Malaysia, not localised for it
The guidelines move. So does the platform.
When coefficients and classifications live in a spreadsheet, a revision is a migration. When they live in the platform, it is an update you do not have to notice.
Structured to the guideline
Built against GP/ST/No.45/2024, and the generated document names its own authority.
Benchmarks and factors maintained
Updated centrally when ST revises them. Where no benchmark is published, we show that instead of inventing one.
Readiness, not a March scramble
Every module carries a status and every building a percentage, all year round.
Sector rules built in
Palm oil mills get FFB, CPO and MSPO fields. Offices never see them.
Questions worth asking before you buy anything
Including the ones where the honest answer is “that’s not us”.
Scope and obligations
Two routes. If your facility uses 21,600 GJ or more across all energy sources in any twelve consecutive months, the energy-consumer duties apply. Separately, a commercial office at or above 8,000 m² carries a building energy intensity obligation of its own. The estimator on this page checks the first and flags the second. It is indicative, not a determination by Suruhanjaya Tenaga.
On notice from ST you appoint a Registered Energy Manager within three months. Within twelve months you need an energy management system shaped around ISO 50001 and a completed energy audit. Reporting then runs on ST's schedule, and re-audits recur on a multi-year cycle. GreenBOS covers the reporting and the management-system record. The audit itself is work for a Registered Energy Auditor.
Ten in the report, nine if you are a commercial premise, because Production & SEC only applies where there is output to divide energy by. The platform decides which applies from your sector and excludes the rest from your readiness denominator, so a commercial building can genuinely reach 100%.
Data and measurement
No. Twelve months of utility statements is enough to start, and the platform converts electricity to gigajoules as you key it in. Sub-metering is worth adding later for a different reason: it upgrades a saving measure from an engineering estimate to metered isolation, which is a stronger verification tier. It is an upgrade path, not a prerequisite.
Measures are verified to IPMVP. Option A is an engineering estimate with key parameters measured. Option B isolates the affected system on its own meter. Option C compares the whole facility against a frozen regression baseline re-based each year. Each measure shows which tier it sits at, the baseline's R² and significance, and cumulative realised savings month by month. Where a saving is too small for the whole-facility method to resolve, under roughly 10% of building load, the platform says so rather than reporting a number it cannot defend.
Conversion coefficients, sector and subsector classifications and benchmark targets are maintained centrally rather than baked into your spreadsheet. When a revision lands we update them and your figures recalculate. That matters more than it sounds: a coefficient change can move a facility across the 21,600 GJ line without its consumption changing at all.
Yes. The REM view is portfolio-first: every building assigned to you, each with its own readiness percentage, a building-by-module grid to spot gaps, and a ranked list of what needs attention next. Verification is per building, so consulting REMs and in-house ones use the same screens.
Bring twelve months of bills. We’ll show you the report.
A demo runs on your own consumption figures, so you leave knowing which modules you can already fill and which need work.